Clinical governance·Both practices

Clinical governance

Two registered locations, fourteen clinicians, and a regulator that can inspect without warning

3 items need attention
An aesthetics clinic bolted onto a dental practice inherits two regulatory worlds at once. The dentistry is inspected and the clinicians are registered. The facial aesthetics side turns on who prescribed the product, whether that prescriber saw the patient, and whether the practitioner is working inside their competence. Those are different questions with different answers, and one spreadsheet covering both is how a practice ends up unable to answer either.
Needs attention
3
1 lapsed
Clinicians registered
14 of 14
Checked weekly against the register
Audits due this quarter
4
2 not started
Complaints, 12 months
6
5 closed · 1 open, 9 days

Clinician register

Registration, indemnity, training and continuing development — the four that stop somebody working. Registration is checked against the public register weekly, not read off a certificate

ClinicianRoleRegistrationIndemnityCPDMedical emergenciesStanding
Dr Aruna MehtaPrincipal dentistTo 31 Jul 27To 1 Apr 2728 of 30 h14 Feb 26Clear
Dr Marcus VaneImplants & cosmeticTo 31 Jul 27To 12 Sep 2631 of 30 h14 Feb 26Indemnity 18 d
Dr Callum ReithAssociateTo 31 Jul 27To 3 Mar 2711 of 30 hAug 25 — lapsedCannot treat
Dr Priya SandhuAssociateTo 31 Jul 27To 19 Nov 2622 of 30 h14 Feb 26Clear
Ffion LlewellynHygienist–therapistTo 31 Jul 27To 8 Jun 2719 of 30 h14 Feb 26Clear
Rosa BelliniAesthetic nurse prescriberTo 30 Apr 27To 22 Jan 2726 of 35 h14 Feb 26Clear
Showing 6 of 14.
Dr Reith's medical emergencies training lapsed in August and he has treated patients on eleven days since. It is annual, mandatory, and the first thing an inspector asks for. Nobody knew, because the certificate is a PDF in a shared folder and the date was in nobody's diary — which is the same failure this practice has with treatment plans, wearing a different hat.

Practice obligations

Both registered locations

ObligationApplies toLast doneNext dueDaysOwnerStatus
Regulator registrationBoth locations4 Apr 20264 Apr 2027222D. AcharaCurrent
Radiography — equipment test4 units18 Mar 202618 Mar 2027205D. AcharaCurrent
Radiography — image quality auditBoth locations2 Sep 20252 Sep 20268Dr MehtaNot started
Decontamination auditBoth locations14 May 202614 Nov 202681D. AcharaCurrent
Infection control auditBoth locations14 May 202614 Nov 202681D. AcharaCurrent
Emergency drugs & equipmentBoth locations1 Aug 20261 Sep 20267F. LlewellynMonthly
Record-keeping auditSample of 2011 Feb 202611 Aug 2026−14Dr MehtaOverdue
Legionella risk assessmentBoth locations7 Jan 20267 Jan 2028500D. AcharaCurrent
Two audits are owned by the principal dentist, who is in a surgery forty hours a week. Both are the overdue ones. That is a scheduling problem, not a diligence problem.

Complication protocol

The one route into the practice that is never allowed to queue

TriggerRouteGoes toTarget
Pain, blanching or colour change after fillerPortal, SMS or phoneClinical lead, then on-callImmediate
Vision change after any facial injectionAny routeClinical lead, then on-callImmediate
Swelling or infection after a dental procedurePortal or phoneTreating clinicianSame day
Anything else, within 14 days of aestheticsPortalTreating clinicianSame day
A patient describing pain and a colour change after dermal filler is a time-critical event, and the practice has one route where that message could sit in a shared inbox until Monday. This is the rule that takes it out of the queue: the message is classified on the way in, the clinical lead is paged, and the log exists whether or not it turned out to be anything.

Aesthetics governance

Different questions from the dentistry, asked of every single treatment

RequirementAppliesTreatments checkedCompliantStatus
Prescriber saw the patientPrescription-only products412412100%
Prescription on file, in dateEvery POM treatment4124084 missing
Written consent, treatment-specificAll treatments1,1841,17113 missing
Cooling-off period offeredFirst-time patients284284100%
Practitioner within competenceAll treatments1,1841,184100%
Before-and-after photographsAll treatments1,1841,042142 missing
Adverse event logOngoing77All recorded
Complication protocol acknowledgedAll patients1,1841,184100%
Four treatments have no prescription on file. Those four are the ones that matter — everything else on this list is tidy by comparison.

Photographs are the weak point

Treatments without before-and-after142
Of which had a complication2
Complaints where photos were requested3
Photos available for those 31 of 3
Photographs are boring right up until somebody complains. Two of the three complaints involving aesthetics last year turned on what the patient looked like beforehand, and in two of them Bramfield could not produce it. The treatment cannot be marked complete without them.

Open complaint

  • Received
    16 Aug 2026 · in writing · dermal filler asymmetry
  • Acknowledged
    18 Aug · within the practice's 3-day standard
  • Clinical review
    Due 30 Aug · before-and-after photographs available
  • Written response
    Due 6 Sep · 21 days from receipt
  • Indemnity notified
    Not yet required
Every complaint has a clock on it and a deadline that is the practice's own published standard. Missing your own standard is worse than not having one.